By Ed Smallwood
I remember when
The problem was, it wasn’t true. It was true that
Now flash forward 7 years. I’d been reading a book called Plan B 2.0 by Lester Brown. One of the points he makes is that the plans on using corn-based ethanol as fuel will be putting our food into our cars instead of our mouths. This may not be a good idea over the long term. A few months later, as oil goes over $100 per barrel, gasoline starts flirting with $4 per gallon, and ethanol starts making economic sense, the cost of rice starts increasing. Rice starts being rationed. Congress starts to debate the logic of creating distilleries to produce ethanol out of corn, and in fact, seriously considers a moratorium on the building of these distilleries.
Just a second here. Something seems wrong—really wrong. Could the production of corn-based ethanol really be causing these food shortages? Or is someone trying to take advantage of us again? My suspicious nature suspects the latter.
Here are my thoughts. The oil industry has been raking in record profits the last couple of years—profits never before seen in any industry. Single companies such as Exxon Mobil have been making money in amounts that have never been seen in all of recorded history except in government revenues. And they are desperate to make sure nothing changes. Nothing.
There are some problems with this. Change is inevitable. Hubbard predicts that we have reached peak oil production. Production costs will continue to increase from this point out, cutting into oil company profits. That’s a given. The oil companies want to minimize this by drilling in ANWAR and off the coast of
Are we sure
So how does this affect the food crisis? The main difficulty right now is that rice production in several countries, including
However, we have only just begun to build most of these distilleries. Our domestic use of corn to produce ethanol is barely begun. How is this affecting corn use? A little bit, perhaps, but I doubt all that much.
Unless you are driving a flex-fuel car built here in the
Most of the increase we have seen in food prices at the market is because it is more expensive to transport the food to the market—the result of higher fuel costs, not the diversion of food into fuel at this point.
There is absolutely no doubt that as time goes on we will want to stop using corn to make ethanol. We cannot replace oil with corn based ethanol—we don’t grow enough corn and we never will. However, I don’t think that this is what the oil companies fear. What they are afraid of is that these same distilleries will work just fine in the production of cellulosic ethanol. This is currently not economically viable—the enzymes needed to turn cellulose into sugar for the yeast to consume are too expensive right now, but this is likely to change. As gasoline prices increase, the cost of those enzymes becomes less of an issue.
The key is that these oil companies must stop you from doing anything different. They must make sure you have no options except to buy their expensive gasoline, and they must force others to sell them oil at a reasonable rate. Anything that disrupts this must be stopped at all costs, and cellulosic ethanol could be a disruptive technology.
I strongly believe that this food shortage is being hyped as a way to stop ethanol before it gets a chance to affect gas prices. I am skeptical of the media reports, and very skeptical of Congressional Representatives getting up and trying to put a moratorium on distillery building.
I fully agree that corn-based ethanol is not a long term solution to oil, and I will cover my thoughts on long term solutions in a future post. However, it makes sense as a short-term solution as better solutions are being worked on.
No comments:
Post a Comment